Processed: netty-tcnative: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

block 827061 by -1

Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828304 828324 828422 828251 828394 828418 828390 828393 814600 828231 828354 828320 828426 828083 828403 828287 828288 828408 828416 828358 828381 828413 828446 828330 828328 828427 828407 828273 828322 828399 828281 828245 828319 828228 828448 828406 828372 828445 828269 828286 828305 828336 828323 828331 828343 828435 828351 828342 828345 828401 828449 828367 828349 828327 828375 828314 828442 828363 828127 822380 828308 828255 828297 828293 828312 828291 828438 828412 828279 828296 828414 828142 828325 828359 828262 828290 828244 828335 828395 828302 828230 828253 828385 828391 828338 828369 828419 828278 828377 828250 828350 828431 828237 828266 828283 828321 828252 828341 808669 828268 828378 828347 828316 828436 828261 828289 828404 828392 828329 828402 828447 828298 828434 828384 828415 828396 828139 828432 828260 828428 828332 828248 828313 828247 828292 828271 828386 828353 828417 828362 828275 828258 828256 828295 828280 828241 828326 828424 828374 828265 828318 828285 828439 828421 828450 828242 828301 828437 828440 828376 828267 828246 828282 828235 828257 828234 828398 827068 828309 809271 828356 828380 828409 828249 828443 828364 828410 828333 828315 828340 828405 828423 828254 828348 828366 828299 828389 828433 828306 828232 828239 828334 828429 828276 828236 828397 828240 828307 828370 828339 828387 828360 828263 828229 828411 828379 828382 828270 828277 828300 828272 828352 828357 828243 828420 828284 828344 828425 828355 828361 828346 828388 828317 828264 828373 828368 828444 828082 828274 828303 828441 828238 828337 828383 828259 828365 828233 828371 828430 828311 828310 828294 828400
827061 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828451
--
827061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061
828451: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828451
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use
debian-***@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:49:19 +0000
with message-id <E1c6cEp-000Etb-***@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#828451: fixed in netty-tcnative 1.1.33.Fork23-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #828451,
regarding netty-tcnative: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ***@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Hi,

this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55

Sebastian

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use
debian-***@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

[d***@fau.xxx]

Upstream are aware of this issue, but quite stuck on it, by the look of
it:

* https://github.com/netty/netty-tcnative/issues/263
* https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/6320

This is going to be a problem, as netty-tcnative can't be removed from
testing, as it chains to fop, which half the world build-deps on for docs.

* netty-tcnative
* netty
* jython
* batik
* fop
* half the world

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use
debian-***@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Post by d***@fau.xxx
Upstream are aware of this issue, but quite stuck on it, by the look of
* https://github.com/netty/netty-tcnative/issues/263
* https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/6320
This is going to be a problem, as netty-tcnative can't be removed from
testing, as it chains to fop, which half the world build-deps on for docs.

My understanding is that the only open issue is the renegotiation that is no
longer supported/ possible. If that is that the case then I suggest to drop
that and be done with it. Renegotiation initiated by the client is something
one does not want (since it may cause high load on the server). Also I don't
know anything *good* it will bring.

Sebastian

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use
debian-***@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

tags -1 + patch

Bug #828451 [src:netty-tcnative] netty-tcnative: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Added tag(s) patch.

[d***@fau.xxx]

Upstream have accepted both patches. netty 4.1.20 has been released,
which will run against a patched netty-tcnative. There hasn't been a
netty-tcnative release.

netty-3.9 is still in Debian, which also depends on netty-tcnative.
netty-3.9 has 14 build-rdeps. Eurgh.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use
debian-***@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.